sparky8811
Posted: Fri, 11/07/2008 - 7:51pm

  Really, what is YOUR definition of DONKEY???

 Me personally, I figure it to be anyone that goes against conventional wisdom + time tested facts of math, whether knowingly, or due to complete ignorance.

SOCIAL PLAYER, this donkey would be at that bar anyway, oblivious to poker knowledge, not caring as he is "just being sociable" and, having an ecstatic good time win or lose.

Hyper Aggression works best here, as he doesn't want to stop having FUN too soon. If he makes it past color up all bets are off, as he may start trying the things he's overheard from the ones that win a lot.

DELIBERATE, he's very aware of how to play well, and, simply chooses not to, as his whole enjoyment derives from putting bad beats on someone that steams when receiving said bad beat. 

Slow Play this guy, he will do most of the raising for you, until you spank him a few times. The good news is his memory is short, and he will start all over again the next time you face him.

JUST CAN'T GET IT, this would be the cat that is far, and, away the easiest to take advantage of. He just can't grasp that a flop of  A  A  9   is not that good for his  9  10. Yet he is sure that his "Two Pair"  is a very strong hand. Calling all the way down unaware that A  2 has him dominated. Even boldly proclaiming at hands end "I had 2 pair I had to call"  R O T F L M F A O.

This guy also is the MOST DANGEROUS, as he usually has SOMETHING to call you with, i.e. a monster draw to the strait, flush, or, boat. even sitting on the afforementioned 2 pair he can catch a boat, tread lightly when the possible draws hit.

  They all get lucky from time to time(Don't I know it). Good for us, they, ALL, can be consistently beaten by a thinking HOMOSAPIEN (not a queer for those of you in K.C.)  They each need a different style to defeat them, therein lies the quandry(again if your in K.C. that's a dilemma err..brainbuster).

If you don't respect your elders, I'll have to teach you to respect your betters,      Sparky



Reddog
3 in a row may be impossible.
Posted: Mon, 11/10/2008 - 1:13pm

Your commentary on donkeys is a good one. It partially leads me to this bold statement: No matter who it is, I do not believe any human alive can win 3 tournaments in a row with more than 50 people playing. ESPECIALLY when there are a number of people who have no clue as to how to play. They think the game is all luck and will not fold 6 3 because it adds up to 9 and they were born on September 9 at 9 o'clock. Or some other similar logic.

The better players have an advantage, for sure, and would almost always prevail in a ring game, but not necessarily in a tournament. They can play flawlessly and get Aces or Kings sucked out by a runner runner runner flush or straight. It is not a rare occurrence. Having played hundreds of live games and hundreds more on Full Tilt, NOTHING surprises me anymore.

So you can win a tournament by playing well, and maybe two, but I believe is is extremely difficult to win 3 because you must avoid losing on Aces, Kings, Queens, Big Slick, medium straights or flushes, trips, by being nailed on the River. And you know how often that happens.

I can think of no other game where a very good player can be knocked out of a tournament by an infinitely inferior one.

Think of golf, basketball, bowling, track, bridge, or any other game where skill will always win in the long run. No 20 handicap golfer will ever beat Tiger Woods, Never. And no beginning bridge team will ever beat two experts over the course of a full day. Maybe for one hand or one game, not not in the long run.

Not so with a Hold 'Em tournament. So, if anyone out there has won 3 in a row, I'd like to know about it. 3 final tables would be much easier, even being in the top 3 or 4, but too many variables enter the equation to win.

Please let me know your experiences.

 

Reddogg 



Shortround
Actually won 4 in a row
Posted: Mon, 11/10/2008 - 3:17pm

That doesn't change the truth of your statement though. Even though the first and last one were 50 or more people, the middle two were very small. One was about 20 players and the other only 14 or 15.

I think I play fairly well. Tighter than most like many older players. But I still got lucky or more accurately avoided the bad luck.

"I was always taught to respect my elders but it keeps getting harder and harder to find one."



Reddog
4 is fantastic.
Posted: Sun, 11/16/2008 - 3:45pm

Even though there were not 50 people in all the tournaments you won, 4 in a row is very hard to do. A good accomplishment. 

The bad luck suckouts are almost impossible to avoid. If you read Moneymaker, a book written by the 2003 World Series winner, you'll see he got there in large part by lucky hands, along with some good play, obviously. (I'll bring it to El Cobre for you to read, Phil, along with your $2.) But whoever wins something like that needs a whole lot of luck and has to beat people who get nailed with really good hands. The winner this year got a 1 outer on the river to win a hand with about 5 players remaining at the final table. And he had trips 3 more times after that, and got an inside straight on the final hand, as I recall.

Some real-life examples from tournaments I've seen just this past week: A guy I play with got busted out of back-to-back tournaments on the same day with Aces in the hole. He won a tournament a few days later by continually hitting straights on the river heads up, with trash in his hand.

Another friend of mine was playing in an online tournament of 90 people, and there were 10 left. Bubble time. He was on the big blind with AK suited. Of course he raised. An AK flops. Two of the flop cards were suited. Not 3.  Is he going to fold now under any circumstances? You can see it coming, can't you? Somebody chased him all the way down and got a flush. My friend was the Bubble. How wrong is that? 

I got busted out of two tournaments in the past week with Kings in the hole, and a King on the board (with no Aces there, and no pairs). Can't get much better advantage than that. Both times someone stayed all the way to the River and hit a flush. And they did not have the right pot odds to call. Could have tripled up on both occasions. Got busted out with Kings on another one against Q 10 of Clubs. I was all in for 3 times the big blind. And the blinds were pretty high. I knew on the flop I was done for. A 10 hit, so all he needed was another 10 or a Queen, and of course he hit a Queen on the River. Couldn't have been a King or any other of the 39 cards in the deck besides a Q or 10.  It happens ALL THE TIME. I try to get to the River with an 85 to 95% advantage if I can, and I am sure those hands don't win that often. Perhaps 50%. I'd take 40. 

I read once that it is not the bad cards that get you into trouble, it's the good pre-flop ones. You can't fold them, especially if they are Aces, Kings or Queens, and Maybe Big Slick suited, and they are going to lose often. You get stuck unless you have decided beforehand that you will play NOTHING (as long as you have built up a fairly good stack of chips) until you make it to the final table or to the final 3 or 4 players. That's hard to do sometimes.

In the final analysis, it might all just be Karma. Some people are very lucky, and others get what they deserve.

"Deserve's got nothin' to do with it."

Clint Eastwood to Gene Hackman in The Unforgiven, just before he blasted him with a shotgun. 



Reddog
Maddening and endless.
Posted: Tue, 11/18/2008 - 4:20pm

There is an endless supply of people who will chase all the way to the River. The more you play the more you see it and it is an eternal mystery. Please explain the mindset. Would they play the same way for real money? I have to wonder. 

I won a game on Full Tilt last night, so I thought that I would try for 2 in a row, then maybe the 3 that I still say is impossible. I'll tell you why.

I was doing OK, but kept getting nailed by this one player who chased all the way to the River with junk and hit 4 different times with cards like 75, 63, K2 . On one hand I had 2 Queens in the hole, a pair on the board and bet big to make calling a bad idea. But not for him. A King came on the River and I knew he had one, and nothing with it. And he did. I kept building chips until I nearly caught up with him then had Kings. I bet and I bet and he stayed and hit an Ace on the River.

Why didn't I go all-in on those hands, you ask? Because I knew that no matter what I bet he'd probably call, and Kings and especially Queens are going to lose if an overcard comes up, which it will about 1/3 of the time. So I would have been out on both those hands. I preferred to use the fact that he stayed too long to win his chips a few thousand at a time.    

So I built back up more chips, and it was down to 3 people, and one was almost absent and hardly ever bet or called. I looked down at AK of clubs. I knew that could be trouble, but raised big anyway. An AQ6 hits the flop. Pretty good, but still vulnerable to a lunatic who had something like Q5.  I made a bet of $1600 on a $240 big blind. He called. Another rather mediocre card hit and I make another large bet. Of course, he calls again. A Jack hits the River. I bet. He goes all-in. What does he have? K 10. He chased all the way down for an inside straight.

That is exactly why it's impossible to win the 3 in a row. Good players aren't going to nail you on 2 or 3 out miracles. They will bluff and raise and try to scare you off, or trap, orplay position on you, but they are not going to chase. For the most part.

Somebody explain it to me. I know, its free poker, but it's experience and my goal is to get better every day. And there are times, many many times, that it does not matter how good you are.  I guess it's like they say, Texas Hold 'em takes 5 minutes to learn and a lifetime to master. A lifetime is not long enough.   



sparky8811
I'll 'splain Dog
Posted: Tue, 11/18/2008 - 6:24pm

   FREE is the biggest component in play.  The donk isn't going to lose any of the allowance from mom, and, dad.  He also has probably had some "sucess?" playing like that, he went rather far in the tourney of which you speak, giving him MORE reason to think his "style?" of play is valid.  I believe somehow YOU need to FORCE him to THINK a little harder, whether that is slow playing a monster with ticky-tack little raises that induce a re-raise that you can push on, or ridiculous over the top bets whenever you have him isolated with superior cards.  If you play full tilt often, always make notes on all players tight or loose or stupid.  I cannot emphasize that enough, I recently ran into a player I had not played in quite some time in a final table at bodog, and almost made the mistake of not checking my notes on him, until, he entered a multi way pot I had raised with J-J.  I then thought to check my notes only to see he likes to raise with stupid cards in 1 - 3 player pots, but if he comes in with many players he always seems to have a monster.  I knew as soon as I read that, and, he raised, that I needed to run away(he had K-K)  I'm certain that fold after my initial raise only spurred him on to raise me repeatedly the rest of the night when we were in pots together, (my notes,and,experience told me that heads up, his cards are less than stellar, he was simply trying to push me off.)  I started raising small, 2X the big blind with good cards, only to have him re-raise causing the isolation I would normally like to generate, then I have him volunteering more of his stack in a situation where I felt I was winning, I then raise him 2X the POT getting me some folds, and, some nice wins.  If I hadn't made those notes I would not have figured him out until it was too late. 

   Make those notes often, and, repeatedly.  I have many players with conflicting notations, that can be sometimes explained by their chat, (always read chat never respond).  A player may appear tight one time (when you see no chat, he's doing well).  Donkeyfish the next with a short stack, and, bitching up a storm in the chat box.

   Also Dog, the books that I read all seem to say a good player looks to himself first and foremost to FIX what's wrong with losing.   What can you do differently??  YOU must NOT be predictable, make HIS notes on you be wildly inconsistent!!! LIMP with a big pair once, RAISE 7X the big blind the next time, maybe even show'em once or twice so he is certain that you had him beat, but, beware, he will adjust if you show.  Last but not least stop assuming that he cares one iota the outcome, or that everyone should try to play well.  If it wasn't for donkeys there would be no consistant winners.

If you don't respect your elders, I'll have to teach you to respect your betters.     John Wayne, ... True Grit

   Sparky,



Shortround
And always remember this....
Posted: Wed, 11/19/2008 - 2:33pm

There are many people who can't learn and a whole bunch more who just refuse to learn.

I feel bad for the first group. They are unfortunate so help them along. The deserve it.

The second group is unworthy of help so make them pay whenever you get the chance. They deserve that.

"I was always taught to respect my elders but it keeps getting harder and harder to find one."



Reddog
Good analysis
Posted: Wed, 11/19/2008 - 4:14pm

I respect your points, and they are good. But here is my question? How do you play people who just will not fold no matter how bad their hands are? You get them exactly where you want them and they stay, thinking that runner-runner to a straight or flush is a coin flip. It's the same mentality that drives people to buy $20 to $30 worth of lottery tickets per week, thinking the chances are pretty good to eventually win. After all, they only have to pick 6 numbers, so maybe they think they have a 1 on 6 chance, who knows? I don't think there is any good, predictable way to beat them. Keeping notes on really tough, good players makes a lot of sense. But I'm not sure about the others. I can give way too many examples to make my point.

I'm guessing that all good players out there usually have lost premium hands rather than chasing with junk.

Just in the past 3 or 4 days I have had these hands and been kicked to the curb:

AAA once. AA twice. AK suited twice, KK twice, KKK three times. And in no case did they have proper odds to call. They were all suckouts.   

 

Everyone loses on hands like QQ through 10 10, especially when people have an Ace or King against you. You are taking a chance. But when you are short stacked and go all in with a high pair and someone stays with something like J4 offsuit, because it's one of their favorite hands, and beats you on the River, then you're in Donkey World. 



sparky8811
Mak'em PAY
Posted: Mon, 11/24/2008 - 4:22pm

   Reddog, here's how I approach it.  If I KNOW I'm in a pot with a player that will make those terrible chasing calls,(notes), I make them pay an extra premium for chasing against me. 2X the pot as a rule, in person at poker pub, I try to socialize with some of them, befriend them even, in the hopes that I will get a goodwill fold once in a while.  Much harder to do online to be sure.  It does come down to KNOWING that my superior cards will prevail more often than they will lose.  Quite simply those AA,KK, hands will be beat sometimes, but, you can optimize what you make, when they hold up against poorer cards.  It is all part of the analisys in play.  How much will he call?  How much will it take to make him fold?  If your desire is to make him fold, ALL-IN that donkey every time you are sure you have the best hand.  When you lose your tournament life is over, but, when you win you have put yourself in a desireable chip position for the rest of the tourney.  They do hold up more often than they lose, my notes bear that out.  AA the last 28 times played to the river busted only 11 times.  % are in YOUR favor, I suspect you are somewhat addicted to the action, and, can't stand being sent to the sidelines before your time.  I too have a hard time coming to grips with that (thus keeping track of the ACES to the river, makes me feel better). 

   In closing I will say that there have been plenty of times I under bet the donkey, just because I do not want to get knocked out early.  The feeling you get when AA holds up and, you know you could have been paid much, much, more is just as disconcerting as an early out.

If you don't respect your elders, I'll have to teach you to respect your betters.       Sparky



Reddog
Good response
Posted: Fri, 11/28/2008 - 1:59pm

Sparky, I really do appreciate your well presented input. Where do you play?

I'm not sure I am addicted to the action, but that I want to see what works and to try and get as high as I can as a challenge. It's the same reason I spent hours shooting basketballs, pitching baseballs against the barn, and practicing golf endlessly. Just to improve. 

I don't mind at all being beaten by good plays or good players. I appreciate that and learn from it. However, it's hard to take losing to clueless calls and just plain ridiculous luck.

 I'm still working on the 3 in a row challenge, and got a 1st, 3rd and 1st in 3 Full Tilt tournaments, but there were not 50 players. Also a 6th out of 90. And I did get lucky on the River a couple of times there, I must admit. 

Still looking for that person who gets 3 in a row.

Thanks again 



sparky8811
All over
Posted: Sat, 11/29/2008 - 1:44pm

   I play freerolls only, then take the $$$ won into small time ring games, a mistake I am going to correct by playing sit and gos.

   Want a challenge? As well as a lesson in donkey taming?  Pokerstars has 12,000 player freerolls that typically get down to 1,200 in 1hr.!!! The top 99 finishers advance to weekly round 2 with a $2000 prize pool.  I've made the cut 3 times recently, Sat. will be the first time I cash hopefully.

   Bodog I like for the 5,000 player fields, less, frequently. With a $500 prize pool (real money). I have maid over $200 there, but cashed out most. (I like to spend my winnings)

   I recently downloaded Full tilt to look for you!  I have just missed the T$ payout once already. It is hard to catch the narrow sign up window with 2,700 players the field fills quickly, I am sure I'll get used to sign up times and get in a few more soon. 

   My casino adventures here in St.Louis have been funded solely by home game winnings. (it's amazing how your friends don't invite you back when you dispatch them in record time LOL)

   I am not ready to put my paycheck on the line as it were. I am sure I have a lot more to learn.  I do enjoy, and appreciate, talking with (you) someone that has a differing perspective as it stimulates thought.  I recently went back to my favorite poker book for a quote for you. "When I have to put my money out there, my money's out there. Everybody knows that ... So if you want to mess with me, it's going to cost you ... You have to be willing to die in order to live in these tournaments ... That's basically it." Amir Vahedi 2003 world series. From  "Poker the Real Deal" by Phil Gordon.                     simon and schuster publishing.  A MUST READ in my book.

   When I play I'm Sparky8811 just like here. I'm sure I'll be seeing you soon. Kill or be Killed      Sparky



Reddog
3 in a row update.
Posted: Thu, 12/18/2008 - 4:39pm

I still maintain that 3 wins in a row is nearly impossible, even in small games. Tell you why. I've won 2 in a row on full tilt a few times lately, but not in games over 18 players. Got 2nd in a 90 player one yesterday. Got a few land-based first places, but not even two in a row. And why?

In 4 of the last 8 games I've played, I've gone out on Big Slick, and have not once won with it during that time. I still maintain it is the worst big hand to have. I'm guessing that it wins about 25% of the time, no matter how you bet it. Fact is, the last time I won with it, about a week ago, I slow played it, and luckily hit an Ace and King hit the board. Even that was no certainty.

Other hands that got me out were: I had trips 3 times and got flushed, and a King high straight that lost to another flush. So all the above hands could have won, none did, and would have stopped a streak of any length.

Anybody win 3 in a row yet? And what do you think about Big Slick? I just don't see why it is considered the 3rd best hand.

Any solutions?

 

RD 



sparky8811
Suited ???
Posted: Thu, 12/18/2008 - 5:43pm

   Three in a row is not IMPOSSIBLE only improbable.  "IF" you really see all of these straits, and, flushes, play those kinds of cards.  AK, KQ, QJ, J-10, 10-9 all suited of course.  All players need a bluff game as part of their arsenal.  Simply make sure to structure yours around suited connectors as much as possible.  If you are constantly seeing straits, and, flushes, win, you must be playing to make a strait, or, flush.  If you nail an open-ended strait, four to the flush on the flop, think of the outs. 9 possible of suit, 8 possible bookends.  Thats 17 count'em 17 cards that give you domination over 2 pair, or, a set.  Oh did I mention at a table of 8 there are only 35 cards left in the deck. Giving you correct odds to call ANY bet by a hand you believe you WILL beat as your odds of catching are 50/50.  I reiterate, play those hands yourself.  I believe that it all averages out, just as many pots are won with a big pair as are face card flushes.  I also believe there ARE guys out there that are anomolies.  They simply have more of that happen than others, you have a mirror image somewhere that always sees 1, or, 2 pair win and NEVER sees any flushes. (that dude has it soooo easy, but, he never wins a big pot either). lol  The movie"The Cooler" is a true story of a guy that killed all luck at gaming tables with his bad luck, he was paid to sit down next to big winners by the house.

  Quote for the topic; " The bigger the pot, the sooner you should be inclined to win it." 

   It sounds like the same old free/low limit stuff.  Reddog if that flush chasin' strait catchin' game has NO place in YOUR game.  Then take it away from your opponents as well.  Price them out pre-flop, and, on the flop, and if they incorrectly call you always have that EXIT STRATEGY to rely on.  I still think you should play more suited connectors though, especially in position, small blind, to, hi-jack ... LIMP with ANY suited connectors (even 2-3). start making sure that you get your share of all them flushes, and, straits.  In moderation with a tight image a little betting variance Bigger on Q-Js  than 9-10s.

   I recently did 2 wins followed by a 2nd win one win was a 7 table game "all ppub"  one was 3 the second at a 4 table.  I think more than anything YOUR mental attitude changes enough to tweek your game a tiny bit, your good hands have been holding up so maybe you let your guard down a little tiny bit then ... POW !   It's over, where you thinking about a 3-peat or, the hand in play??  Did you forget that you abused this guy last week and now he's looking to put a bad beat on "Mr.Good cards" (too busy thinking about 3).

    Sparky

 

"If you don't respect your elders, I'll have to teach you to respect your betters"



Reddog
Too busy
Posted: Fri, 12/19/2008 - 1:17am

No, I'm not too busy thinking about 3. I'm simply saying that there are too many variables out there and too many rivers and too many people calling who have no business doing so to make it probable. Any of the top pros will say that they would much rather play against a solid player than a fish. And like I said, you can bet as much as you want and not get some people out. They'll draw to runner-runner straight or flush. Or they'll stay in with a pair of deuces with 3 overcards on the board with large raises, hoping to get that third deuce on the river, and it happens.

I was not involved in the hand, but I saw a girl call a $12,000 all-in bet the other day, without hesitation, with 8-6 offsuit. (She had about $20,000) Before the flop. Why? Because she was born in 1986 and it ALWAYS works for her. The lady she beat became, let's say, irate, to put it mildly. She was eliminated from the tournament with a high pair. The tournament was comprised of 130 or so players, there were about 25 players remaining, and the top 4 got entry into a Las Vegas tournament. The 8-6 girl cost the other one a chance at that. And there was absolutely no reason for the call except her "feeling." And she was not desperately short-stacked or deep-stacked. It was simply a bad call. That is the kind of stuff you cannot beat. And it happens all the time.

And like you recommend, I do play suited connectors, etc., but my point still is that you can be 91-98% favorite going into the river, with only 1,  2, 3 or 4 outs against you, and get nailed on a pretty constant basis. And you can't get yourself in a much better position than that. But knowing all the odds or plays or proper bets in the world will not prevent the suckouts. 

Still want to know about people's overall experience with Big Slick. Keep track of the last 5 or 6 times you had it and let me know what happened. 



mregister2
Reddog, it was nice playing
Posted: Fri, 12/19/2008 - 3:59am

Reddog, it was nice playing with you at the WSOP tourney at Executive Inn last Sunday.

 I hear a lot of people complain about AK. It is a very good hand, but must be played very differently depending on the situation.

If I am at a loose table as far as preflop calls, I'll often limp with it and try to see a flop for cheap. If I hit, those loose players will tend to pay me.

At a tight table, I will almost always raise with it. That way I can isolate one or two players, and often with proper betting and reads be able to win the pot on the flop or turn, even if I don't hit.

Short stacked I will push all my chips in and hope to steal the blinds or get heads up.

I think the biggest mistake people make with AK is calling bets on the flop and turn when they don't hit. On the flop if it doesn't hit you only have ace high. I'd much rather be betting with Ace high then calling with it. At least there you have a chance of winning the pot if your opponents fold.



Reddog
Back at you.
Posted: Fri, 12/19/2008 - 11:25am

Mike, good playing with you also. Wish we could have gotten farther.  Good input as to AK. I agree with what you say. And, yes, you might as well toss them in if you don't hit the flop, unless no one has anything at all and Ace high ends up winning.

A Big Slick update since earlier. Lost another one. Another guy at the table lost with one, and in fact the only time anyone won with it was when two people had it at once and split. I did see one in the past few days where 2 guys had it in the same hand and lost to J 2.

Another example as to why you can't win 3 in a row: Just happened. Had to go all in with AQ because I was short stacked, and got 3 callers. We were the only ones left out of 90. Winning the hand would have put me back in pretty well. 2 Queens and a 4 hit the flop. Pretty damn good, eh? Another guy had 2 4s. That was it.  I give up. Until the next game.

  



Reddog
Update
Posted: Fri, 12/26/2008 - 3:16am

Since the last post, actually won with AK. On the River! Call CNN. Also, had 22 and down to the felt and got a 2 on the River. The Poker Gods smiled. 

2 more reasons follow why no one on Earth can win 3 in a row. I invite others to contribute their ridiculous, ironic hands.

1. Was down to 4 in a live gave. Had KcQs. Called. Q of clubs and 2 spades comes on the flop. I'm a little less than medium stacked comparatively. I go all in. 2 fold. The other guy was short-stacked and thought for a long time then called with 45 of spades and said he had to get home anyway. (A sure way to win) It wasn't a bad call. He was short-stacked and had a flush draw so had about a 40% shot. You think he got the flush, don't you? Wrong. Runner runner 5s. I would not have minded a flush, but the trip 5s were a bitter pill. He ended up 2nd. I was crippled and went out a few hands later on the big blind with K10 against 92.

2. Got to heads up in a more recent game of around 24 people. Had come back from a pretty low stack to about even with the other guy. Flopped a straight and went all in. I could have slow-played it but it didn't matter. Because he called and hit a runner runner flush on the Turn and River. Yes, I know it happens a lot, but it's just another example why the game can never be completely conquered. Not never.

Earlier that night, someone flopped a King high flush (King in hand), and no ace on the board. Another person flopped an Ace-high one on the same deal. After playing thousands of hands, I've only seen that one other time. Usually the Ace is by itself and catches up on the turn or river. But they just had to flop it at the exact moment in time as was flopped the King high one.   

Let's hear about some world-class suckouts and incredible beats, like the guy who lost with 4 aces against a royal flush in the 2008 WSOP. Can that one be beaten? 



Tiberius
What a Donkey is in Poker
Posted: Thu, 12/25/2008 - 2:11pm

A donkey is easy to define.  A donkey is a poker player who obviously doesn't have a clue what they're doing.  They get branded the donkey when they catch a winning hand when the odds were against them.  

A donkey will often chase with little possible return on their pot investment.  A donkey will play heads up with 2-7 hole cards. 

A donkey often celebrates an early win.  The donkey usually gets knocked out as their chips dwindle from bad play after bad play.  They seldom win larger tournaments. 

-Tiberius

 

   

 



Reddog
Curse of the Big Cards
Posted: Sun, 12/28/2008 - 6:38pm

This does not have a lot to do with donkeys, but the run this player had was amazing, and she was drawn out on at least twice. In a significant way.

I was playing in a tournament of around 24 players. Weirdly, 5 really strong players were on the rail in the first 15 minutes. It was quite unusual. One of the girls out, a very solid player, said that it was a "curse of the good cards." She was beaten with a pair of queens, then a pair of kings, then AQ suited after she had hit a good flop. Someone chased her to the River and knocked her out. But that's not the good part.

In the second game, she sat at my table. There were 21 players in the tournament. In about 45 minutes, she got aces in the hole twice, queens once, jacks, 10s, and deuces (she flopped 4 of a kind.) Additionally, she had king-suited hole cards, twice,  and flopped a flush. She won all those hands. Now here is the REALLY good part. She did not make it to the final table. Think about that one for a while.

 

 



Reddog
Ironic Torture
Posted: Fri, 01/09/2009 - 7:52pm

Like a GV player says, (you Phil), it's almost worse to have tossed in your cards with which you would have won than get nailed on the River. I'll get to that in a minute.

I very seldom get out of Green Valley, but had to go to Tucson for a reason and decided to try Clicks. Heard there were some good, aggressive players there, and there were. It was a pleasure playing with them all. 

There were some suckouts as a result of aggression, and maybe some Donkeyism, but this concerns my initial paragraph. Poker is often a damned if you do, damned if you don't game that can be ironic torture.  Example:

There were about 30 players at Clicks and I got to the final table, then down to 5, and we all had pretty good chip stacks. Then these hole cards came: A pair of deuces, and someone raised and reraised before it was my turn. I folded. A deuce came up and I would have won. Next hand I got AJ unsuited and folded after raises and reraises. I'd wait and let these guys knock themselves out some more, I thought. Besides, AQ and AJ had killed me a lot of times recently. Of course, AJ came up and I would have won. Next was Q10 and I folded because it is a marginal, desperation hand. A Q10 hit the board, of course. Torture! Then, K2 unsuited, a rotten hand which I folded and 2 kings hit the board. More torture! If I had stayed on ANY of those hands, I would have tripled or quadrupled up, and knocked out 2 or 3 people. But nooo. I saw that the winning hands turned out to be in the area of KJ or Q9 or something like that. No great hands and no Aces. So now more irony. Blinds were now at 2,000 and 4,000 and 2 folders around to me, with the blinds left. I had KJ. So what do I do, I raise  to 12,000. Small blind folds and the big blind calls and naturally, has A10 and I am crippled. I guess it was a donkey move. All I had to do was call and see the flop. But oh no. Now the blinds keep going up and I win one Jedi hand and last for a few more hands and get blinded out on another Jedi, so got 4th. And it was all there on a silver platter if I had just called another hand or two. But how do you know. Presently, my crystal ball is broken.

So, it was a good experience and the people were nice and it was a good challenge, and Mike Register does a good job of running the game. I did OK, but only wish I had represented Green Valley just a little better. Maybe next time. If the golf cart will start.  



mregister2
It was a pleasure having
Posted: Sat, 01/10/2009 - 3:24am

It was a pleasure having you at Clicks! I hope you can make it up here a few more times. Clicks is an interesting place to play. The players in the smoking patio tend to play a lot more aggressive then those in the main room.

 I remember the look on your face when those flops came out at the final table. You played it exactly right, though. If you were in early position with those cards, where you could have bet out first instead of having to call a raise and a re-raise, then I think you probably would have won that tournament.



Reddog
Appreciate it.
Posted: Tue, 01/13/2009 - 9:04pm

Mike,

I appreciate your words. It really was a good experience; one that got my attention. Will see you and all the other tough players at the Executive Inn on the 18th. Hope I can move up a few notches higher than usual. 



Reddog
Donkey Extinction
Posted: Wed, 01/21/2009 - 2:16pm

Some species will become extinct, but like the cockroach, the poker donkey never will. Some real-life examples:

In a Tuesday game, a player who wins quite often because she is aggressive and does not care and gets ungodly lucky at times was on one of her rolls. She stayed on every hand pre-flop, and every flop hit her for about 15 hands in a row. It did not matter if anyone stayed or not, or how little or how much she bet, she won. Before or on the River. She built up from 4,000 to over 20,000. Then she tried to bluff all of her chips at another player who had 18,000. That player had Aces. So our friend was now down to 2,000. Was that the end of it? Oh no. She got on another roll and could not lose and finally got to heads-up. She called an all-in bet with 2 3 offsuit. 2 3! She flopped 4 5 6 and won. Some say the game is all luck, and everyone knows better, but in this case it REALLY was. Next time you play, try her method, which is to never fold no matter what and see how far you get. You have to depend that almost every flop will hit you, and if not, every River. I'd like a full report.

Example 2:

Our winner left after the first game, and a guy who had a few sat down in her seat. He employed her exact methods. In one 5 hand stretch he got 3 full houses and 2 flushes with starting hands like 10 4 and J 3 and Q 5. Then he slowed down and folded a couple of hands. At this point, another guy at the table went all in with 3500 chips with Aces. Our man hesitated for about 2 seconds with his 9 4 and called. Yep, he got runner runner 4s. Then after a  couple of winning hands for him,  we moved to the final table. He had around 25,000 or so. Long story short is that we got down to 5 players and I had gotten lucky on 2 Jedis and was up to 16,000. Our man and I were big-big blinds at 10,000. You know how big-bigs can happen after a blind gets knocked out. Anyway, I get a pair of Queens. Another player goes all in with her last 6,000. She had Kings. I raise to my last 16,000 and our man thinks a while and calls. He has Q2 of clubs. This was an interesting event. If the Kings win and we knock out the Q2, I'm still at 20,000. If I win I would have a huge stack. It was immaterial, because Q2 hits a flush on the River, which, for him, happened the 4th time in the game. The Kings and Queens are gone and he now had 47,000. Sadly, his luck finally failed him and he got second.

Would have been a better story if he had won, wouldn't it? With a 2 3 offsuit and hitting a straight or flush or full house. But he'll be back. They'll all be back.

 



sparky8811
feeling your pain
Posted: Fri, 01/23/2009 - 8:57am

   Disheartening to be sure. Do you play these clueless ones all the time?  I'll stand by the laws of #s here, and, bet they are out very early, waaaay more often than they win.  Here in St.Louis we have many of those players, thus, the initial posting.  I was in fact posting the 3 types of players at my table from the previous night.  All other 7 players at that table could be easily pidgeon-holed into 1 of those categories.  I do not believe a "good" player can survive such a table let alone advance in a tournament, unless helped by the donks knocking each other out a a pace quick enough to bring reasonable players into the mix in time to change table texture. 

   I think the only hope can be ... in Poker Pub ... to get "lucky" on the table assignments, and, not get more than 2 "donks" at any table.  LOL lets make it a RULE Poker Pub??  "Not more than 2 Donkeys at a table"  The floormen know who they are, it's do-able, if more than the alotted # of donkeys show up at a venue just have a waiting list!

             Busting a gut 4 now ... Sparky



Reddog
Out of my system
Posted: Sun, 02/22/2009 - 2:08pm

OK, I have to get these past few games out of my system because I don't want the thoughts of them to fry my brain any longer. It will be the last post regarding suckouts, because:

a. It happens to everyone.

b. Nobody really cares.

But this was a particularly horrific streak and it has to be destroyed.

It started with a live game and there were 3 of us left. Our chip stacks were fairly even, give or take. I was all-in with a fairly weak ace, and another guy sucked out on me with the usual runner runner runner flush. That's OK, I thought, because I had a couple of lucky hands earlier. So I didn't feel so bad.

Then, it got bad. 

The next day, I played 6 games on Full Tilt (250 chip buy in with 90 people.) The goal is to get to the final table, where you earn chips. I got to the final 15 in all the games. Here are the hands I had which knocked me out:

Aces three times, Kings once, Queens once, and trip 5s on the flop. Yes, I know, these hands can all lose, but 6 games in a row? And here is what they lost to:

Aces: Q 10 suited got a flush on the river. Q 3 unsuited got 2 pair on the river. 67 unsuited got a straight on the river. (I had the wheel.) In every one of these, I had bet enough before the flop to narrow down to just one other player. Why in the hell did they call? Was there any donkeyness involved, do you think?

Kings lost to 10 3 unsuited against an all-in bet. (A flush on the river)

Queens lost to Jacks. (A third Jack on the river. He was a severe underdog.) That was not really a donkey call, just a suckout.

3 5s on the flop. I made a large bet and another guy chased all the way to the river and got a flush. He was only 3 to the flush after the flop. I doubt if any sized bet would have made him fold, in his magical thinking world.

Can you see how this could get on your nerves?

The karma in this series of games was REALLY bad. It was like a nightmare without end, the kind to put you on serious tilt.

I don't mind being outplayed. At all. In fact, it is instructive. What is hard is losing to someone who calls for no apparent good reason and nails you right through the heart with a suckout. And the torturous repetition of it. 

It will happen again, and again, I know, so the only thing to do is to get the money in with the best hand and hope, and try to stay positive. Sometimes it is hard, and can make you gunshy if you are not careful.

That's it. No more bad beat stories unless it is world-class, like that 4 aces against a royal flush at the WSOP last year.

Good philosophical questions from AP Mike and Mike Register. I'll try to dredge up some answers. See you at Executive or Clicks heads-up, I hope. 

 



mregister2
I'm the opposite of you
Posted: Sun, 02/22/2009 - 3:02pm

I'm the opposite of you Reddog. I don't mind when someone sucks out on me because it means I am doing something right and they are doing something wrong. Of course, I do curse my luck at times.

I absolutely hate being outplayed, because that means I am making mistakes. But it is a learning experience.



Reddog
I see your point.
Posted: Mon, 03/02/2009 - 12:53am

Mike,

I see what you mean. However, what I mean is that I appreciate a good play that anyone makes, even if it means I get beat by it. Sometimes you are in so deep and have really good odds and really can't fold. That's the play I mean, and perhaps you haven't made a mistake. And maybe the other guy is staying with a really good draw and is a solid player and it just works out for him. That's OK. And sometimes you might get slow-played and ambushed by a well-hidden hand and your hand is a very good one.

What I hate is getting outdrawn by someone who stays for no good reason whatsoever and lucks out, then spouts some theory or says "That's poker." That's relates to the Donkey aspect of this whole thread started a few months ago.

 

 



Reddog
A What Would You Do scenario
Posted: Mon, 03/02/2009 - 10:17am

A scenario: Put yourself in this situation and decide what you'd do:

You are in a 90 person fast tournament. You start with 1500 chips. You are down to the last 13 players and the final table is 9, which is the only place you can earn any payoff.

You have doubled up plus a little and have 3300 or so chips, and you are somewhere in the middle of the pack as far as chips go. The blinds are 100 200, so still small. All you have to do is wait a while and fold until you get to the final table, if that is your goal. 

You haven't had many playable hands lately. You look down at KJ of clubs. You call. No one raises and there are 4 players now, one caller after you and the blinds. 

The flop is Q 10 of clubs and Ace of hearts. The pinball machine is going off in your head; you've flopped Broadway, a flush draw and a royal flush draw. 

You make a sizable bet, but not all-in because you want some action. The caller goes all in. He is the chip hog at the table with around 20,000 chips and has been playing and raising almost every hand. He has been caught bluffing a couple of times, sometimes has something, and sometimes just gets lucky. Is there any reason whatsoever you would fold?

Let me throw in some wrinkles:

1. Pretend you have a crystal ball and know for sure that a club will hit the River.

2. You are in a televised WSOP event In Las Vegas and getting to the final table is something you've fantasized about for a long time. You've also fantasized about having a huge mountain of chips and getting to at least heads-up.

3. Let's say it would cost you everything you have (money, cars, house, a valued body part) if you lose the hand and all your chips. 

3. There are some ways to lose, I know, but you factor that in and make a decision. What do you do? 

 

 



APMike
Red Dog,  I think I see
Posted: Tue, 03/03/2009 - 6:50pm

Red Dog, 

I think I see where this is going. If my crystal ball shows me anything other then the A or 9 of clubs. I don't think I want to see the club. I also do not want to see the board pair because a full house then can come into play. It is in my best intrest for 2 blanks to come out so I'm sitting on the nuts at the end. Having the nuts on the flop forces you to make the call but allot can happen from the flop to the river. I would have played it the same, make a normal bet hope for some action and then see how the cards come out. The flush is my enemy because it puts a ton more hands that could be played by that type of player that can beat me.  I'm never happy to see a nut straight become the second best flush. So yes you have to make that call and then hope the board does not pair or for the club to come out. Always keep an exit strategy open if you can , If not get your money in with the best of it and pray. 

 

All the chips are mine. I have just been nice enough not to take them yet.



Reddog
That's about exactly right
Posted: Wed, 03/04/2009 - 1:27am

AP 

 I agree, you can't fold. Depending on the body part. Now a wrinkle is that a 10 hits on the turn and 8 of clubs on the River. How do you like it now?

In real life, that is what happened.

Guess the eventual outcome. 



sparky8811
Hmmmmmm
Posted: Wed, 03/04/2009 - 8:55pm

   90 X 1500 divide 13 means the MEDIAN stack should be MORE than 10k you are VERY SHORT in my book, you did say FAST, the next level will put you at 10 X the BB or WORSE.

  That's why I would have pushed a little harder PRE-FLOP, and, why I would have pushed ALL - IN, the nano second that flop hit.

  It would seem that Ace club, Q or 10 any, are your most likely opposition, both have LOTS of drawing possibilities, but are losing on the flop...PUSH ... You are not assured a spot in the payouts, if what you say about Avg. is true then there are a very few really big stacks that are staying pretty dormant, unless they catch a BIG hand, they are simply waiting, the Avg. to short stacks could potentially push chips back and, forth some, not knocking any one out.

  Going back too my initial math (if it's right?) you are still below median even, IF, you double up.  If you are the type of player who has ideas of limping onto the final table for a small payout, you should be mucking EVERY HAND at this stage, being able to make 1 more lap than 10th could be the difference FOLD THEM ALL HERE.

  If you want to win you have to be willing to lose, and, YOU ARE VERY SHORT!  Raise pre flop 1000 on top, be as uncharacteristically quick to grab your chips on the flop (ALL OF THEM) as you can, and, put'em out there while you have the best of it.

  "Deserve's got nothing to do with it."

                Sparky



APMike
Reddog
Posted: Fri, 03/06/2009 - 5:33pm

Well I'm hating this, every worse case happened. I went from having the nuts to at least 35 hand combinations that can beat me. The only cards that I wanted would have been two low red cards that did not pair.

 Since you are telling the story my guess is that you lost. So with the bet on the flop I could see you getting called by anybody with 2 pair or bettor and the Ace high flush draw.

Lets go with the worse case first and I will take that as my choice. So I will go with that they had pocket 8's. Second guess is that they had 10-8 and last but not least the worse way to make the nut flush and you will tell us that they had Ac-2c.

So like I said I make the all in call, but when the two things happen that I don't want. I have to start thinking that I'm beat and start to plan my exit from the table. If they do turn over pocket 8's I'm also planning how to get out of the casino as fast as I can. Just hope road rage does not take over on the trip home.

AP

All the chips are mine. I have just been nice enough not to take them yet.



Reddog
All likely
Posted: Sat, 03/07/2009 - 12:18pm

AP,

Those are all nightmarish scenarios, and are all likely to happen in Donkey World, and all cause road rage.

And Sparky, your betting advice is good, and sound, but has no effect when you are up against players with no knowledge of odds or pot odds or who are in some form of narcotic or alcohol-induced haze, or who have just had their palms read by Reena the Moon Goddess. They have a FEELING.

Anyway, all those card combinations are possible, and the above scenario has and will happen all the way to the end of time. In this case, the guy had Q 10 offsuit and got the full house. The KJ wasn't a strong enough hand to make a monster pre-flop bet, but even if an all-in bet had been made, it's likely the Q 10 would have stayed. 8s would have been the most brutal, and I've seen that one. The overcards on the board meant nothing, nor did the betting. It's just that 8 was their lucky number.

Both of you had great input.

Sparky's calculations and assessment about stack size relative to the blinds come from Arnold Snyder, I assume. Let me tell you I've studied that and tried his advice many, many times about pushing a lot of money (or all) in regardless of your cards when you are below a certain number of big blinds, and I have to say that my track record is about 10% when that happens. It truly is about who you are playing against. When you are playing against calling stations, you're pissin' against the wind. There is not enough money in the world to get them out, so you have to revert to a trapping game and wait.

 

RD  

 



Reddog
Calling Station Mania
Posted: Sun, 03/08/2009 - 4:36pm

Let's make up a fantasy table of poker superstars. Let's put Phil Ivey, Phil Hellmuth, Daniel Negreneau, Dan Harrington, and Stu Ungar, supposedly the greatest poker player ever, at the same table. Add your favorite to the mix, or yourself.

I'm going to make a bold statement:

No matter how great these people are, they would be in great danger playing against Calling Stations that a team, or whole herd of Clydesdales, could not get off a hand. I can think of a few from my own experience, and so can all of you.

Here's why our fantasy table would be in trouble. Consider this scenario:

Let's say Ivey has Big Slick, Ungar AJ of diamonds, Hellmuth a pair of 10s, and the Calling Station has a hand like 6 9 unsuited. Ivey raises, Ungar calls, Hellmuth calls and so does the 6 9. Why? Lord knows. It can make a straight, it adds up to 15, or it's erotic. Whatever. Of course, the 6 9 player wants to see the flop. Every flop. Ace Jack and Six(of diamonds) hits the board. Ivey raises, Ungar reraises, Hellmuth calls because he is short-stacked, and so does 6 9. Why? He/she has a pair now. Now a King of diamonds hits the turn. Ivey's Big Slick is feeling really good and goes all in. Ungar with the AJ feels he can't really fold because of his two pair and 4 diamonds, and calls. He has 11 outs, and would really like to see another Jack. But he knows that's only a 5% chance. Another 6 falling on the River has the same odds. But 6 9 really doesn't know that, or care. So he/she calls. Of course. And, of course, a 6 hits on the River and the 6 9 wins the pot. Whoopee! they say, It's all in the cards! After Ivey and Ungar take turns strangling the 6 9, they leave and commit Road Rage crimes and are put into Joe Arapaio's tent city for a while.

Do you think this scenario is an exaggeration? Well, it's not. I've seen it dozens of times. It's happening somewhere right now. Write with some examples. I know you have some.

 RD 



sparky8811
Style.
Posted: Sun, 03/08/2009 - 8:28pm

   It all comes down to ones individual style/approach to playing the type of player were talking about.  I tend to go BOTH ways.  If my table has the kind of player you speak of, (drugs/chasers), I bet, and, raise mercilessly.  That DELIBERATE donkey is the one that has me trying to trap, something I'm not comfortable with as it seems to require limping in a LOT of hands, requiring also playing less than quality starting cards, and, making for some really tough decisions later in the hand even when you hit.

  I've read enough that I can't credit the original source for my calculations, but I hear plenty of pros reinforce that same idea 10X the blind is getting short.  It simply cripples a straitforward game, given a nice raise pre-flop, a couple of callers automatically removes any real fear of your stack, because it can't now rival the pot...

  I would never ever recomend pushing "regardless of your cards" when short-stacked, I do feel K - J is good enough to push some serious chips in.

  Not long ago a p-pub player said to me "you take all the fun out of the GAME" mid hand as I pushed all-in with A-K suited preflop, on the button blinds 100 - 200, table of 8 EVERYONE called ... I just know that the better starting cards win more than they lose givin the right circumstances (not against 7 players).  My response was straitforward, I simply told her that "1/2 of the players with chips in the pot now have cards that any knowledgeable player would have mucked for $50, including yours, since you are complaining , I take that to mean you are in the hand with less than good cards yet again, and I know you really want to get lucky on the flop so I have to play like this with very good cards because the whole table is lining up to get lucky ... you want to get lucky???  ALL YOU CAN EAT !!!"

  My speech inspired her to fold, and, emboldened the DELIBERATE donk at the table to call with Q - 3 off.  I made fun of him as he went to play darts, out early again.  Luckily alot of the bad play here in town is from the over 40 crowd??? ALL - IN seems to scare them away, until they have just as good a hand as you, it's the young'uns that call anything anytime any 2 cards.

  Ubuntu ... I am who I am because of who we are.  African philosphy fits. We must overcome the particular players at the table NOW. I seem to pidgeon-hole/stereotype everyone at a table upon sitting down, and, stick with it until proven inaccurate.



sparky8811
Power Table
Posted: Sun, 03/08/2009 - 8:46pm

   I could do without Hellmouth , and, Negreneau.  I'd replace them with Farha, and, Antonius, maybe Tom Dwan too (fight fire with fire).

  I refuse to regurgitate bad beat stories, I dwindle on the good ones that hold up. Constantly reminding the bad callers that they made a bad choice to chase against me.

  John L. Sullivan, Richard Nixon, and, Ty Cobb on the table for kicks too...



Reddog
Good one
Posted: Mon, 03/09/2009 - 1:40am

How about John Phan? He has done well. There are a lot of good ones. That particular group was only presented with the idea that no matter how good a table is (make your own list), they would have trouble against someone who must see the flop and must chase all the way to the river. Forget bluffing and forget the proper amount to bet. And all-ins sometimes just cost you everything against them, even if you're the massive favorite to win the hand.  Yes, Calling Stations are out early often, but they also take a lot of players down with them.

My point isn't bad beats. That happens continuously. Some are world-class. It's how to play against the 6-9 players who don't know they are supposed to fold because that miracle could always happen. It's the intense need to gamble.

It's also why the lights burn bright in Las Vegas, isn't it?

Seems like the best thing to do is get into a Zen Flow and be positive and and play solid and hope for the best. Then if you lose, you really don't give a damn.

Last thing: If you want to see how difficult and unlikely it is to win a big tournament like the WSOP is, read MONEYMAKER. It's about how he won in 2003. He was not a bad player, but could have lost so many times along the way. No matter how good someone is, that would be the case.

Anyone out there won 3 big ones in a row yet? Best I could do was 1st in a 90 person game, 2nd in the next 90, then 1st in an 18. (All Full Tilt) Only 1 in a row in live games. Still have a long way to go to get good enough, but it's a challenge to try.

 

RD 

 



sparky8811
Donkey's don't matter
Posted: Fri, 03/13/2009 - 6:10pm

   R.D.  IF? the 3 in a row is impossible, I do not believe it could be attributed to "the donks".  After all, when up against them the odds are in YOUR favor, the thing is though, "they" NEVER have a 0% chance of winning.  Some of the worst bad calls can have a 20% chance , or better, of winning.  You are 4 to 1 to win, in tournament play there are sooo many defining moments, and AT BEST you can only hope to win 4 of 5 against BAD players, against GOOD ones (in those defining moments) you are bound to be MUCH CLOSER to 50 - 50.  To string together confrontation win, after win, after win, for 3 tournaments in a row sounds pretty impossible now... Even more so were those tourneys all played against all GOOD players.  The true art of poker is picking when those defining moments are for all of your stack or your opponents.   Just sounds like you are realizing how much better you are than many of those that surround you, and it perplexes you how in the hell they can even stay on the table with you.  My last comment isn't so much directed towards you as it is something I have had to come to grips with myself.  "Even a blind squirrel finds a nut once in a while"   I used to see the any 2 cards crowd win once in a great while (it seemed like more 'cause they all get to win twice a year),  it made me feel like a lousy player that the dumbass could even win when in my presence.  The simple math is "You can't win'em all"  keep track of your percent "in class" I call it, I find solace that I finish in the top 10% of large fields regularly.  Talk to some of the bad players get their # and look them up, see how many times they had to play to get 1 final table.  One kid told me after 8 months of grinding "I just want to make a final table someday" at a 2 - 3 table venue.  ?????????????????????????

   You will be seeing him in Vegas this year, as he won a seat in the national tournament, (even a blind squirrel).  I personally remove him from play 3/4ths of the time we sit together as I know how he chases and make it VERY costly, "All you can eat" again, and, again, for him, I am 80 - 20 to win, I like that for an all in any day.

"Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering"

Buy you a drink if you can name the source of the qoute...  Sparky



Reddog
Good quote
Posted: Tue, 03/17/2009 - 12:54am

Not sure of the source. No, I don't think I am superior to the other players with whom I play. Perhaps a certain low percentage, but like I said, I am continuously trying to improve, and I don't think you can ever perfect this game. I have quite a ways to go, and the more you know, the more you know you don't know. Games where tricks are involved, like Bridge and Euchre and Hearts are all a lot easier to perfect. Too many variables in Hold 'em. 

You can know all the odds and things you are supposed to do and not do, but there are all the situational issues, and running through it all is the luck factor. And what I run into a lot is  failure to build enough chips to stay ahead of the blinds a couple of hours into a game. When you have only gotten from the original 4,000 to 20,000 or less, for whatever reasons and fates, the 4,000-8,000 blinds are going to kill you unless you get very lucky. This is especially true when the blinds are 15 minutes of less apart. Then it is much more of a crap shoot. I still have to work on being patient enough to avoid blowing away chips, and  aggressive enough to create a large enough chip stack. There is probably a slight residual fear of being knocked out on good hands if you put a lot on the line. And then being gone too early.

It's a continual experiment. And the streaks are all too real. Put all that together, and it's tough to be a Tiger Woods of poker and dominate every tournament.

Apparently Stu Ungar was like that, to a point, but if you read One of A Kind (quite good), you'll see that even he was busted out (and flat broke) many, many times.

I enjoy your input as I reflect on humiliating efforts and stupidity in key situations in the past few games. Gotta get back into the flow. It is quite a mental game, isn't it?

 

RD 



Reddog
Bad Beat Escape
Posted: Tue, 03/17/2009 - 9:33pm

Talk about dodging a bullet. This was dodging a howitzer. It was a good one. 

I was playing in the Desert Shootout in Phoenix on the 15th. A lot of fun. The blinds had gotten to 200-400. The guy under the gun went all-in for 1600 chips. I had 2700 left. I looked down at AK of clubs. Pretty good. Sitting in the cutoff seat, I called and so did the Button. Now it was a good pot.

Two clubs came on the flop, and a 3rd one on the turn. The nut flush. I considered slowplaying it to get more money from the guy on the button, but decided to go all-in with my last 1100 chips. I tried to talk him into calling, but he threw them in. He had a pair of 10s, one of them a club. He dealt out the River, just for the hell of it, and it was the 9 of clubs, which would have given him a straight flush. I never would have seen that one coming.

It didn't matter much, because a half hour later I blew all the profits. Got caught with my hand in the cookie jar.

But it was a good escape for a while.

RD 



sparky8811
Heavy lifting.
Posted: Mon, 03/23/2009 - 6:02pm

   bodog $500 freeroll, 4500 players, 1500 chips to start, first hand 3 ALL-INs in front of me.  THERE is a poker God, A-A, the complete table calls ALL-IN (not a stray Ace in the bunch either) the best hand up against me was J-J, with both other Jacks dead  J-9(favorite hand) , and, J-2(the dealer ..."pot odds") ??? The rest were all rags, I'll spare you the suspense A-A HIT & held up.  $1500 to $13,500 in 16 seconds.  That was enough of an edge for me to cruise onto the final table for 4th and, 12 bucks for free.  Lets keep the WINNING stories coming.

 

                                 Spaky



Shortround
SPAKY????
Posted: Tue, 03/24/2009 - 8:16am

"I was always taught to respect my elders but it keeps getting harder and harder to find one."



sparky8811
The 1 finger bandit strikes again.
Posted: Tue, 03/24/2009 - 4:00pm

Ha Ha, I took cooking in high school instead of typing.

Spooky



sparky8811
Unusual source, it is.
Posted: Wed, 03/25/2009 - 8:21pm

  Jedi Master ... Yoda.

"fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate leads to suffering"

 



rissaw
" Can't tournaments in a
Posted: Wed, 04/29/2009 - 5:21pm

" Can't tournaments in a row with more than 50 people playing"

 

If that's impossible them I must be really good. My best is 4 wins in a row with more then 90 players 1st place, recorded by Fort Mcdowell casino. Then if you want to cound Online poker into the mix I'v gone about 3 - 4 wins in a row daily.

 

You talk about getting mad when you raise with AK (big slick) & someone calls you? Well wtf you expect that person to read your mind that you have AK? Hell they could have a High pocket pair or even Pocket aces. Anyways my point is you can't blame getting beat by people that call to the river.  



Shortround
4 Tournament Wins in a Row with over 90 Players in Each
Posted: Thu, 04/30/2009 - 12:32pm

Sorry dude but since your name is Jeremy and not Jesus you've lost all credibility.  Didn't happen.   

"I was always taught to respect my elders but it keeps getting harder and harder to find one."



rissaw
Yeah okay, bitter much?
Posted: Sat, 05/02/2009 - 7:45am

Yeah okay, bitter much?



sparky8811
yeah right
Posted: Mon, 05/04/2009 - 11:17pm

  If you win that much ... then why are you in a blog for a FREE league???



baldeagle
sick beat
Posted: Sun, 07/26/2009 - 10:39am

I was in the TOC qualifier final 3. I was the big blind 20000/40000 I had 45000 chip count. I told dealer give me a hand to play. I get big slick AKh. Button calls little blind goes all in I toss in my last 5000. Button calls. everyone turns up cards and what do we have (button) AQ s  (little) KcQd.I like my odds of a triple up. Flop comes 7s 4s 10s I was done. I am not saying that anyone made a donkey call. I am saying sometimes big slick just sucks all the fun out of you. 



Reddog
Still not quite 3 in a row.
Posted: Sun, 07/26/2009 - 10:17pm

Another reason it is tough to win 3 in a row. Never thought of this one. Earlier in the week go 2nd in a live tournament,after being all in with A 10 suited against 8 3. Why did he stay? It was suited. It happens, and I'll play any two cards heads-up myself, so can't say much. Then I  won 2 in a row in the past 2 days (July 25 and 26), then was down to final 4 in the attempt for 3 in a row. It was on Full Tilt. I was somewhat short stacked, but not too worried. There was 1900 in the pot and I had 2100 and hit a straight on the river. Good deal, eh? I went to bet all in against 2 guys who had made fairly large bets in the hand. I got disconnected from Full Tilt right at that moment, so I'll never know what would have happened. Likely I would have tripled up to around 6000. Tried another game and got 3rd. Still can't do it. Yet.

Phil, just saw that you won 2 in a row Friday night. That is hard to do. Congratulations. 

 

RD 



Reddog
Explain it to me
Posted: Wed, 08/05/2009 - 6:30pm

Yet another reason you can't win 3 in a row: 

OK somebody. Anybody. Explain this to me. After enough hands and results like this, I have to know why.

Let's say you have AK suited. On the board is a King, 2, 5 rainbow. The pot is $400. You bet $550, so the pot odds aren't there for anyone to call with a bad hand, or for them to chase. You get a caller. An 8 hits the turn. You make another pot-sized bet which puts you all in. They call again. A 6 hits the river. Their hole cards are 7 4. Runner runner inside straight. About a 1% shot after the flop. How do you play against that? There are many, many similar ones.

Just wondering.Â